 |
|
|||
 |
||||
      |
Learning Library |
CIP and US Presidential Elections |
|
The American electorate intuitively senses the phenomenon of complexity of information processing (CIP) in political candidates. Without exception, American voters elected the presidential candidate with higher CIP, or current potential, in the cases studied. When current potential proved equal, the candidate with higher future potential (the younger of the two) emerged victorious. When current potential and future potential were even, as was the case of Bush versus Gore, 2000, the closest vote in election history resulted. |
Short Readings
- Level of Work and Role Complexity
- Time Span of Discretion
- Potential Capability as Determined by Complexity of Information Processing (CIP) Level
- Capability Assessment Triangle
- Judging Current Potential
- Assessing Complexity of Information Processing via Observation
- Progression Chart
- Designing a Requisite Organization
- Root Causes of Most Organizational Pain
Articles & White Papers
- The Answer is Communication and Leadership, But What is the Question?
- Why HR Can’t Get No Respect
- Looking for Talent in All the Wrong Places
- But I Really Like Her!
- What to Do About Attitude Problems? Promote them!
- Leaders Who Transform Organizations: Finding the Factor for Success
- The Overlooked Managerial Competency
- CIP and US Presidential Elections
- A Gift to Managers
Ask PeopleFit
 |
|
| Copyright 2007 - PeopleFit Inc. |
|
